Lawyers cautions liquidation of Crane bank by Bank of Uganda.

The current state of the law is that receivership ended and Bank Of Uganda has no power or authority over the affairs of Crane Bank Limited.

Lawyers cautions liquidation of Crane bank by Bank of Uganda.
BOU Governor (left) with Sudhir Ruparelia (right)

Several lawyers have warned Bank of Uganda (BoU)’s plans to liquidate Crane Bank Limited (CBL) in receivership as illegal which they say could cost taxpayers more money, should it go ahead.

This follows an announcement by Central Bank that was placed on its social media channels, purporting to place Crane Bank under liquidation.
“Bank of Uganda (BoU) took over management of Crane Bank Ltd (CBL) on October 20, 2016 and subsequently progressed it into receivership on January 24, 2017. In exercise of its powers under section 99 (1) & (2) of the Financial Institutions Act, 2004, BoU has now placed CBL under liquidation and ordered the winding up of its affairs. The Central Bank shall be the liquidator of CBL,” said the Central Bank in a notice signed by Prof. Emmanuel Tumusiime-Mutebile.
Winding up is the process where a company ceases operations, with liquidation being the stage where company assets are sold off to pay creditors.
A number of lawyers this website spoke to all concurred that the move was outside the powers granted to the Central Bank by the Financial Institutions Act (FIA).
“The powers of the Central Bank over banks is granted and governed by the Financial Institutions Act (FIA). It is not arbitrary. That Act sets out the powers and their limits and what the Central Bank can and cannot do. CBL was taken over by BOU in October 2016 and placed under statutory management. In this status it continued running as a bank with its financial institutions license, but was governed not by its Board of Directors or Shareholders, but by a Statutory Manager appointed by Bank of Uganda,” said one commercial lawyer who asked not to be named for fear of retribution from the Central Bank.
Section 95 of the FIA permits BOU to close a bank (i.e. take away its banking license) and then place it under Receivership.
“On January 18th 2017, CBL was closed as a bank (and it ceased to be a licensed bank) and was placed into Receivership by the Central Bank. It ceased to be a licensed financial institution when it was placed in receivership. All of this was within BOU’s power under the FIA, which allowed it to close the bank and to place it into receivership. In both HCCS 493/2017 and Civil Appeal 252/2019, both filed by BOU to assert powers as Receiver of CBL, the High Court and the Court of Appeal both found that the Receivership of CBL ended 12 months after it commenced (i.e. January 2018),“ added another lawyer, that is familiar with the case.
“After this date when the courts of law determined that receivership had ended, BOU lost all legal authority over the affairs of CBL. It must be remembered that BOU’s authority is granted by the FIA and is limited by the FIA. Both the Commercial Court and Court of Appeal Courts found that under the FIA, BOU’s authority as Receiver of CBL ended in January 2018. This means that after that date, BOU has no authority to make any decisions of any kind for CBL. Like at the end of all receiverships, the company is returned to its Board of Directors and Shareholders. After January 2018, CBL by law was supposed to return to its Board of Directors and Shareholders,” the lawyer said.
“The Judgments of the High Court and the Court of Appeal which state that Receivership ended are still in force and binding on all parties. They have never been stayed or set aside. BOU tried to stay the enforcement of the Judgment of the High Court in the Court of Appeal and lost that application. BOU also tried to stay the enforcement of the Judgment of the Court of Appeal and lost that application in the Supreme Court. Both BOU’s attempts to stay were dismissed with costs against BOU. The current state of the law is that Receivership ended and BOU has no power or authority over the affairs of CBL,” the Commercial lawyers added.
Another female financial lawyer also asked to remain anonymous so she could comment more objectively on the matter, said that BOU cannot not move CBL into liquidation and attempts to do so were illegal.
“Firstly, it (BoU) has no authority over CBL matters and all attempts to restore authority have been dismissed by both the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court,” she said.
“The purported placing of CBL into liquidation is illegal and is an abuse of office by the Bank of Uganda. It is also an act of contempt of the Supreme Court in that there is a pending appeal before the Court and BOU is illegally trying to take matters into its own hands to circumvent a binding legal judgment by purporting to move CBL into liquidation. Such a move will render the appeal they filed in the Supreme Court moot and violates the binding decision of the Court of Appeal that Receivership ended which has not been set aside or stayed by the Supreme Court. A receiver without authority cannot progress CBL from receivership to liquidation,” she said.
“CBL ceased to be a Financial Institution within the meaning of the FIA when its license to do banking business was taken away in January 2017 (when it was put under receivership). CBL has not been on the list of licensed financial institutions since then. BOU has powers under Section 99 of the FIA to place licensed financial institutions into liquidation. But that power only applies to financial institutions, which are legally defined under Section 3 of the FIA to mean companies licensed to do financial institutions business. CBL has no such license as at November 13th 2020, and is therefore not a financial institution that BOU can place into liquidation today,” she said.
Mutebile on the concerns of the borrowers says that all borrowers of CBL, whose loans were transferred to DFCU Bank under the purchase of assets and assumption of liabilities agreement between CBL (In Receivership) and DFCU Bank Ltd, must continue to service their loan obligations with DFCU Bank Ltd.
On the hand, all other borrowers of CBL, whose loans were not transferred to DFCU Bank, must service their loans by paying into the designated collection accounts at Bank of Uganda.
“CBL borrowers, whose loans were not transferred to DFCU Bank Ltd., can access a statement of their indebtedness from the office of the Director Commercial Banking at Bank of Uganda headquarters” Mutebile further says.
Creditors of CBL will be notified of the procedure for presentation of their claims to the liquidator according to the notice.
“Bank of Uganda reassures the public that it will continue to protect depositors’ interests, ensure discipline among managers and shareholders of Financial Institutions, and maintain overall stability of the financial sector”- Mutebile.